Category Archives: physics

Search for topological dark matter with atomic clocks

By monitoring correlated time discrepancy between two spatially-separated clocks one could search for passage of topological defects (TD), such as domain wall pictured here. Domain wall moves at galactic speeds ~ 300 km/s. Here the clocks are assumed to be identical. Before the TD arrival at the first clock, the apparent time difference is zero, as the clocks are synchronized. As the TD passes the first clock, it runs faster (or slower, depending on the TD-SM coupling), with the clock time difference reaching the maximum value. Time difference stays at that level while the defect travels between the two clocks. Finally, as the defect sweeps through the second clock, the phase difference vanishes. For intercontinental scale network, l~ 10,000 km, the characteristic time  30 seconds.

By monitoring correlated time discrepancy between two spatially-separated clocks one could search for passage of topological defects (TD), such as domain wall pictured here. Domain wall moves at galactic speeds ~ 300 km/s. Here the clocks are assumed to be identical. Before the TD arrival at the first clock, the apparent time difference is zero, as the clocks are synchronized. As the TD passes the first clock, it runs faster (or slower, depending on the TD-SM coupling), with the clock time difference reaching the maximum value. Time difference stays at that level while the defect travels between the two clocks. Finally, as the defect sweeps through the second clock, the phase difference vanishes. For intercontinental scale network, l~ 10,000 km, the characteristic time 30 seconds.

Despite solid observational evidence for the existence of dark matter, its nature remains a mystery. A large and ambitious research program in particle physics assumes that dark matter is composed of heavy-particle-like matter. That community hopes to see events of dark matter particles scattering off individual nuclei. Considering nil results of the latest particle detector experiments (see excellent discussion here), this assumption may not hold true, and significant interest exists to alternatives.

Now what about atomic clocks? Atomic clocks are arguably the most accurate scientific instruments ever build. Modern clocks approach the 10^{-18} fractional inaccuracy, which translates into astonishing timepieces guaranteed to keep time within a second over the age of the Universe. Attaining this accuracy requires that the quantum oscillator be well protected from environmental noise and perturbations well controlled and characterized. This opens intriguing prospects of using clocks to study subtle effects, and it is natural to ask if such accuracy can be harnessed for dark matter searches.

Posing and answering this question is the subject of our recent paper:
Hunting for topological dark matter with atomic clocks, A. Derevianko and M. Pospelov, arXiv:1311.1244.

We consider one of alternatives to heavy-particle dark matter and focus on so-called topological dark matter. The argument is that depending on the initial quantum field configuration at early cosmological times, light fields could lead to dark matter via coherent oscillations around the minimum of their potential, and/or form non-trivial stable field configurations in space (topological defects). The stability of this type of dark matter can be dictated by topological reasons.

I know, this sounds a little bit too far fetched to an atomic physicist. Well, ferro-magnets could serve as a familiar analogy. Here topological defects are domain walls separating domains of well-defined magnetization. Above the Curie point, the sample is uniform, but as the temperature is lowered, the domains start to form. So one could argue that as the Universe was cooling down after the Big Bang, quantum fields underwent a similar phase transition.

Generically, one could talk about 0D topological defects (=monopoles), 1D=strings, and 2D=walls. Dark matter would form out of such defects. The light masses of fields forming the defects could lead to a large, macroscopic, size for a defect. Based on observations and simulations, astronomers have a good idea of how dark matter moves around the Solar system. The defects would fly through the Earth at galactic velocities ~ 300 km/s. Now if the defects couple (non-gravitationally) to ordinary matter, one could think of a detection scheme using sensitive listening devices, e.g., atomic clocks. In fact one would benefit from a network of clocks, as one would cross-correlate events occurring at different locations.

Phenomenologically, the dark matter interaction with ordinary matter could be described as a transient variation of fundamental constants. The coupling would shift atomic frequencies and thus affect time readings. During the encounter with a topological defect, as it sweeps through the network, initially synchronized clocks will become desynchronized. This is illustrated in the figure.

The real advantage of clocks is that these are ubiquitous. Several networks of atomic clocks are already operational. Perhaps the most well known are Rb and Cs atomic clocks on-board satellites of the Global Positioning System (GPS) and other satellite navigation systems. Currently there are about 30 satellites in the GPS constellation orbiting the Earth with an orbital radius of 26,600 km with a half of a sidereal day period. As defects sweep through the GPS constellation, satellite clock readings are affected. For two diametrically-opposed satellites the maximum time delay between clock perturbations would be ~ 200 s, assuming the sweep with a typical speed of 300 km/s. Different types of topological defects (e.g., domain walls versus monopoles) would yield distinct cross-correlation signatures. While the GPS is affected by a multitude of systematic effects, e.g., solar flares, temperature and clock frequency modulations as the satellites come in out of the Earth shadow, none of conventional effects would propagate with 300 km/s through the network. Additional constraints can come from analyzing extensive terrestrial network of atomic clocks on GPS tracking stations.

The performance of GPS on-board clocks is certainly lagging behind state-of-the art laboratory clocks. Focusing on laboratory clocks, one could carry out a dark matter search employing the vast network of atomic clocks at national standards laboratories used for evaluating the TAI timescale. Moreover, several elements of high-quality optical links for clock comparisons have been already demonstrated in Europe, with 920 km link connecting two laboratories in Germany.

Naturally I hope that this proposal motivates dark matter searches with atomic physics tools pushing our “listening capabilities” to the next level. This proposal could provide fundamental physics motivation to building high-quality terrestrial and space-based networks of clocks. As the detection schemes would benefit from improved accuracy of short-term time and frequency determination, following this path could stimulate advances in ultra-stable atomic clocks and Heisenberg-limited time-keeping.

Tug-of-war model and tuned-out Rydberg

Tug-of-war zero sum of optical forces

Tug-of-war model for a Rydberg atom in optical lattice.  I(z) is the lattice intensity dependence and the atom is made out of a nucleus and two lumps of electronic wave function. For a certain distance between the lumps (\lambda/4),  optical forces on the two lumps cancel each other no matter what the atomic position is.

Finally a chance for a Rydberg atom to tune out, chill out and be all it ever wanna be. Would not it be great to just sail through life hurdles without ever noticing them? Now Rydberg atoms can just do that easily and naturally, thanks to the latest theoretical understanding coming from our group.

We find special "tune-out conditions" that guarantee that Rydberg atom motion remains uninhibited by optical lattice. This is illustrated by  the tug-of-war Figure to the left. Here a 1D Rydberg atom is made out of a nucleus and two rigidly placed lumps of electronic density.  The total dipole optical force vanishes  when the diameter of the orbit is equal to half the lattice constant.

For the 3D case, realistic atoms, and all the technical details, see our publication:
Tune-out wavelengths and landscape-modulated polarizabilities of alkali-metal Rydberg atoms in infrared optical lattices, T. Topcu, A. Derevianko, Phys. Rev. A 88, 053406 (2013) arXiv:1308.6258

Here is the abstract:
Intensity modulated optical lattice potentials can change sign for an alkali metal Rydberg atom, and the atoms are not always attracted to intensity minima in optical lattices with wavelengths near the CO2 laser band. Here we demonstrate that such IR lattices can be tuned so that the trapping potential seen by the Rydberg atom can be made to vanish for atoms in "targeted" Rydberg states. Such state selective trapping of Rydberg atoms can be useful in controlled cold Rydberg collisions, cooling Rydberg states, and species-selective trapping and transport of Rydberg atoms in optical lattices. We tabulate wavelengths at which the trapping potential vanishes for the ns, np, and nd Rydberg states of Na and Rb atoms, and discuss advantages of using such optical lattices for state selective trapping of Rydberg atoms. We also develop exact analytic expressions for the lattice induced polarizability for the m_z=0 Rydberg states, and derive an accurate formula predicting tune-out wavelengths at which the optical trapping potential becomes invisible to Rydberg atoms in targeted l=0 states.

Dirac sea and Rydberg atoms in weak optical fields: why antimatter matters

It turns out it is important to include positron Dirac sea into the relativistic (meaning starting from the Dirac equation) description of how Rydberg electrons respond to weak optical fields.

Yes, positrons were invented to avoid the collapse of electrons into the continuum of states below the rest-mass gap and that brilliant speculation led to the entire idea of experimentally-observed antimatter. And, yes, Rydberg electrons are non-relativistic (in fact, nearly classical) so why would they know about antimatter? Is not it surprising?  What we find is that in certain gauges one would fail to recover even the leading order of  the AC Stark effect without including antimatter.  Here is the link to the full paper, which has other goodies as well.

Dynamic polarizability of Rydberg atoms: applicability of the near-free-electron approximation, gauge invariance, and the Dirac sea, T. Topcu and A. Derevianko, Phys. Rev. A 88, 042510 (2013)http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.0573

Abstract: Ponderomotive energy shifts experienced by Rydberg atoms in optical fields are known to be well approximated by the classical quiver energy of a free electron. We examine such energy shifts quantum mechanically and elucidate how they relate to the ponderomotive shift of a free electron in off-resonant fields. We derive and evaluate corrections to the ponderomotive free-electron polarizability in the length and velocity (transverse or Coulomb) gauges, which agree exactly as mandated by the gauge invariance. We also show how the free electron value emerges from the Dirac equation through summation over the Dirac sea states. We find that the free-electron ac Stark shift comes as an expectation value of a term proportional to the square of the vector potential in the velocity gauge. On the other hand, the same dominant contribution can be obtained to first order via a series expansion of the exact energy shift from the second-order perturbation theory in the length gauge. Finally, we numerically examine the validity of the free-electron approximation. The correction to the free-electron value becomes smaller with increasing principal quantum number, and it is well below a percent for 60s states of Rb and Sr away from the resonances.

Magic Rydberg

 

Rydberg electron in circular orbit can be attracted to laser intensity maxima. Thereby a laser beam can serve as a tractor beam for cold Rydberg atoms.

Rydberg atoms in circular states can be attracted to laser intensity maxima. Thereby a laser beam can serve as a tractor beam for cold Rydberg atoms.

Here is our recent paper  on the possibility of decoherence-free design of quantum gates mediated by Rydberg-excited neutral atoms. This quantum computing architecture utilizes atoms  trapped in optical fields, e.g., in optical lattices. In order to reduce motional dephasing we determine trapping conditions where AC Stark shifts of both ground and Rydberg levels are the same (so-called magic trapping).

 

 

 

Intensity landscape and the possibility of magic trapping of alkali Rydberg atoms in infrared optical lattices, T. Topcu and A. Derevianko, arxiv.org:1305.6570

Motivated by compelling advances in manipulating cold Rydberg  atoms in optical traps, we consider the effect of large extent of Rydberg electron wave function on trapping potentials. We find that when the Rydberg orbit lies outside inflection points in laser intensity landscape, the atom can stably reside in laser intensity maxima. Effectively, the free-electron  polarizability of Rydberg electron is modulated by intensity landscape and can accept both positive and negative values. We apply these insights to determining magic wavelengths for Rydberg-ground-state transitions for alkali atoms trapped in infrared optical lattices. We find magic wavelengths to be around 10 um, with exact values that depend on Rydberg state quantum numbers.

This result is somewhat unusual and more details can be found in this talk (link to pdf)  given at the Dresden workshop on ultracold Rydberg physics.

UPDATE: published: Phys. Rev. A 88, 043407 (2013)

Tutorial on translating particle physics effective Lagrangians to conventional atomic physics and quantum chemistry operators

Occasionally we have to carry out calculations with some effective Lagrangians
supplied by our particle physics friends (possibly related to new physics
beyond the standard model). For example, we could be given a Lagrangian density


where is some scalar field, is the Dirac field (electrons) and is a coupling constant. The Dirac equation that is conventionally used in atomic physics reads

(I suppress interactions of electrons with each other and with the nucleus). Given what is that extra operator that I would have to add to my Dirac Hamiltonian? I consistently derive in this tutorial (pdf).

For the impatient, the result is \begin{equation}
V^{\prime}\psi=-\gamma_{0}\left( \frac{\partial\mathcal{L}^{\prime}}
{\partial\bar{\psi}}-\partial_{\mu}\left( \frac{\partial\mathcal{L}^{\prime}
}{\partial\left( \partial_{\mu}\bar{\psi}\right) }\right) \right) .
\end{equation} Applications to axions and "Higgs portal" interactions are also covered in the tutorial (pdf).